When the prolific columnist, Charles Onyango-Obbo, wrote
that the International Criminal Court “had finally made Kenya an African
country” he meant that the government’s reaction to the trials had aligned the
country more closely with policies in much of the rest of the continent. I
think there is another, perhaps more profound, sense in which Kenyans have
become Africans.
To begin with, I have always been uncomfortable with the
notion of “Africa”. It has not been apparent to me what, apart from an
overabundance of pigmentation, I am supposed to possess in common with most of
the other billion or so residents of the second-largest continent. And far from
simply describing people from a place, the term “African” has come to imply some
sort of historical, metaphysical and supra-cultural bond, which is loaded with
all sorts of flattering and not-so-flattering stereotypes.
Sadly, many of my fellow Africans have been content to
reflect and enact the tropes of Africanness. A favourite one is that of the
“African Big Man.” No, I don’t mean of the well-hung variety, but rather the kleptocratic and genocidal tyrant-for-life who nonetheless commands the
unquestioning loyalty of his tribal folk because their only goal in life is the
extermination of their ethnic rivals.
The African Union has become an unfailing mirror of these
reflections. At Its summits, the continent’s Big Men (and few Big Women), regularly
get together, it seems, to commit ever more outrages on our common
sensibilities. At Kenya’s instigation, last year’s pow-wow in June in Malabo,
Equatorial Guinea, voted
to expand the jurisdiction of
the yet-to-be-established African Court of Justice and Human Rights to cover international
crimes, with the caveat that the Big Men as well as their senior government pals
would be immune from prosecution while they remain in office. The move was
meant to deliver Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and his Deputy, William Ruto,
from the clutches of the ICC. And it was welcomed by their fellow Big Men who
are wont
to remain in office for rather longer than their subjects can reasonably expect
or tolerate.
Any idea of accountability in this life is an anathema.
Kenya today provides an excellent example of the state continually frustrating
any attempt to punish either current or former government officials or their
misdeeds. The report of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission, which
named almost every star in the country’s political firmament, seems to have met
its end in the National Assembly where it went to be “improved”
by the very people it mentioned adversely.
As a result, Kenya’s two fabulously wealthy and still-breathing
ex-presidents, Mwai Kiabaki and Daniel arap Moi continue to live lavishly on the public purse despite widespread reporting, countless
commissions of inquiry as well as interminable police investigations concluding
that their tenures were characterised by officially sanctioned murder and
theft. None of their senior officials have been pursued either. On the
contrary, the current administration has simply picked up where they left off. In fact, during the most recent AU summit, the
Kenya government maintained its single-minded determination to ensure that African potentates never again have to endure
the prospect of facing justice.
And a new crop of leaders is learning just how useful this
“Big Man” syndrome can be. Recently, two first-time legislators were caught on camera at a weighbridge trying to throw their weight around and
intimidate police. The problem? A truck belonging to one of them had been
impounded for not having the necessary paperwork. In less than two years, they
have learnt, that in the Big Man tradition, the rules don’t apply to them.
Of course impunity has always been a large part of Kenya’s
story. But with our support for the government's exertions at the AU, we appear to have thrown our hat in
with that community of nations that defines itself solely in terms of its
powerlessness. A site of perpetual victimhood, of constant and exhausting struggle
against imperialism and colonisation. A place of contradiction where the foreign-funded AU can, without the slightest appreciation of the irony, declare that the equally
foreign-funded ICC, where its members constitute the largest block, with an African
prosecutor and judges, is a tool of imperialists.
By becoming Africans, Kenyans have accepted to be faceless,
nameless victims. To have a cheap and expendable existence. To live at and for
the pleasure of Big Men. To repudiate “foreign” notions of accountability. We
have accepted that the continent should first deliver for the powerful, before
it delivers for the multitude. If that sounds familiar, it is because it should
be. To become an African is to go back to the roots of Africanness. To don the
costume of moral and material backwardness spun for the continent by the Big
Men from Europe who were determined to subjugate it and who have since been replaced
by our home grown varieties. It is, in short, to accept our place at the bottom
of the human pile.
2 comments:
a painful read whose truth annoys
Those are legitimate problems and they are existing NOT because Africans are predestined to a bottom of global socioeconomic structure but because of the corruption itself which evolved to a status of "social art". Elite-benefiting system such as communism, colonialism or crone-capitalism are good at creating those self-sustaining corruption systems. This particular source explains it well:
Professor John Mukum Mbaku of Cameroon and a world authority on corruption in Africa makes the point that given the incentive system provided by existing rules, legal strategies and other forms of corruption, cleanups are unlikely to be effective.
"It does not take advanced training in economics to know that corruption is an inefficient method of allocating resources that also creates market uncertainty galore,' he says. "But corruption also has certain positive benefits. Corrupt practices are flexible and highly responsive to an uncertain political landscape and an often ossified bureaucratic structure. Corruption also bows to the reality that even mid-level public servants are supporting numerous extended family members, and that civil service salaries are inadequate to satisfy the many demands on a salaried official.'
Corruption was not invented in Africa, nor is it unique to Africa. The reality is that corruption exists in Africa because the conditions are right for it to exist and until those conditions significantly change, it is likely to continue more or less unabated. This does not excuse the reprehensible and dishonest leaders and public officials in Africa who make no attempt to discharge their duties with integrity and equanimity. But even a token effort would be better than doing nothing.
Source: http://bit.ly/19adUsb
How to systematically get out of such serious impasse is the only legitimate issue at hand here.
Post a Comment